|
A GENTLEMAN'S GUIDE TO EVENING WEAR (SECOND EDITION) |
|||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
Lessons from the Past: Style above Fashion
Risking Traditional BenefitsYoung men choosing a tuxedo for the first time have many choices today. They can opt for the designer creations featured on the red carpet and in fashion magazines or the latest trends offered by formalwear shops and Web sites. With all of these modern alternatives what guy would want to wear a tuxedo like his grandfather’s? The one who knows a good thing when he sees it.
Since the 1960s, modernist attempts to reinvent black tie have typically arisen from the perception that it needs to be more comfortable or more contemporary. However, proponents of classic menswear argue that the formula has already been perfected and tampering with it is not only needless but will invariably mar the outcome. Black tie’s components “have been perfected over many decades by the best tailors and most astute dandies,” says traditionalist Nicholas Antongiavanni. “All the necessary compromises have already been made. To press further is to lapse into vulgarity for the sake not of comfort but of fashion.” A 2004 Wall Street Journal editorial concurs: This is the power of the traditional costume--it is at the same time aristocratic and democratic. The very uniformity of the tuxedo makes it socially leveling. And whereas most instruments of democratic equality tend to lower all boats, the tuxedo levels up. Would-be improvements invariably throw the aristocratic-democratic balance out of whack. Change for the WorseSartorial PitfallsFor the most part, history has validated the traditionalists’ argument. Ever since the rise of the baby boomers in the 1960s, attempts to replace black tie’s convention, maturity and conformity with modernity, youthfulness and individuality have almost always failed, often spectacularly. To wit: Men who opted for traditional black tie in the forties and fifties look like Cary Grant or Frank Sinatra in their prom and wedding pictures, the epitome of cool. In contrast, their sons who viewed themselves as infinitely hipper in the 1970s ended up resembling Lawrence Welk dancers in their own portraits. Their subsequent self-assured offspring who also chose trendy fashion over traditional style later found themselves cringing at photos of Duran Duran wannabes. And now Generation Y males, convinced they’ll never look as ridiculous as their predecessors, are smugly dressing themselves as morticians for their own big day.
Social PitfallsAs botched as they may have been, past generations’ misguided choices of prom and wedding formal styles impacted no-one but the wearer. By the time the perpetrators were old enough to attend proper black-tie functions they had usually learned their lesson and realized the numerous benefits of following the dress code’s customary interpretation. However, many of today’s young men – particularly in the creative industries – have decided to carry their indiscretions beyond the wedding hall and into the realm of formal galas. Here their choices also impact those around them because they diminish the sartorial uniformity that lies at the heart of the black-tie dress code. Poor InfluencesThe poor choices of the past fifty years have been abetted, if not directed, by the rise of equally poor influences. The dearth of sartorial role models in the modern world begins at the top of the fashion pyramid with today’s trendsetters: pop-culture idols. When debonair movie stars and performers like Clark Gable and Cary Grant used to walk the red carpet they could be always counted upon to epitomize black-tie’s understated elegance and uniformity. Today, however, Hollywood fashions are often influenced by young celebrities who have little or no understanding of the principles of men’s formal dress and view it primarily as a tool for attracting attention. The all-pervasive fashion industry is no better a teacher because it is largely composed of the same stylists that feed the witless celebrity mill. While menswear magazines and high-end retailers once educated readers on the etiquette and elegance of conventional evening wear, they now spotlight designers’ frenzied attempts to catch the public's fleeting attention. Couture’s practice of constantly trying to reinvent fashion may be fine for everyday wear but it is anathema to attire named for its role as a preserver of traditional form. These capricious designer and celebrity trends then filter down the fashion pyramid to influence the offerings of the mainstream “formalwear” shops that cater to the vast majority of the tuxedo wearers. Consequently this industry’s salespeople are more likely to be trained as specialists in inventory turnover than experts in traditional etiquette. It is much easier, after all, to sell a young man on the latest vogue then to take the time to explain the sublime advantages of a century-old tradition.
Change for the BetterDespite the grim track record of the past fifty years, history has also proven that not all change is bad. In fact, what we define as classic black tie today would never have come into existence if it were not for change: soft-front shirts with turndown collars were considered the height of informality when they began appearing with tuxedos in the 1920s and traditionalists of that era were equally reluctant to accept the double-breasted dinner jacket or cummerbund as anything but casual summer alternatives. The critical difference between black tie’s pre-war modifications and the ones that came later is that the original changes were introduced by men with an impeccable sense of style and a thorough familiarity with the purpose of formal attire. In other words – and this can’t be emphasized enough – the only people who can successfully bend the rules are the ones who understand them. Having established that seeking black-tie guidance from today’s most common tuxedo trendsetters is akin to obtaining writing instruction from an illiterate, where do we find teachers who genuinely understand style and tradition? Well, a man can look to style and etiquette authors, celebrities with a proven penchant for classic styling, experienced tailors and knowledgeable black-tie partygoers. Or he can educate himself and become his own best mentor, a process made ridiculously simple by this very Guide. The Fundamentals of Black TieAn effective self-education in the fundamentals of successful black tie begins with a review of the key components of this site. In particular, the basic definition and role of proper black tie as spelled out in the Etiquette section, the History of black tie’s evolution and the specific details of the sartorial benchmark, Classic Black Tie. Out of this review emerges the fundamental merits of black tie:
These merits are achieved through a few fundamental rules:
Rules for Bending the RulesOnce armed with the “rules” of successful black tie a man can join the ranks of those qualified to judge the potential success of modern variations. In addition, he can take advantage of a few secondary guidelines to assess how best to bend those rules:
If by this point you are still undeterred from tinkering with black tie’s time-honored standards then it's time to take a look at popular contemporary variations in the context of those benchmarks. After that you should finally be ready to assemble a modern ensemble that won’t make you cringe at the evening’s photos ten years down the road. |
Following the lead of the best dressers of the 20th century is sure to guarantee success. Oblivious to history's failed experiments, each new generation seems convinced that they can improve on the classics. Today many men choose their formal attire based on the influence of poorly dressed celebrities walking the red carpet. . . . . .and on the marketing campaigns of a formalwear industry that often treats the tuxedo as a novely costume.
Samuel Jackson demonstrates how to skilfully bend the rules . . .
. . .while Tim Burton shows how to crassly break them. |
||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||
|
UPDATES · GLOSSARY · SEARCH · ADVERTISE · DONATE · BLOG · CONTACT COMPARATIVE ENGLISH TERMINOLOGY Picture credits: Hover over images / check picture properties for image source. Text and original images copyright © 2008, 2011. Peter Marshall. All rights reserved.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||